Commentary

[ Previous ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]

      

The GOP Program
by Lionel E. Deimel

In the 2020 presidential contest, the Republican Party did not bother to announce a platform. The effective platform became whatever Donald Trump or other GOP office seekers promised voters. This year, the Republican Party has put forward an actual platform, albeit one with pie-in-the-sky objectives and little indication as to how those objectives might be met (or even whether they are consistent with one another). The platform is something of a list of Donald Trump’s greatest hits.

Democrats fear that the real Republican Party agenda is articulated in the 900-page Project 2025 report, “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise” from the right-wing Heritage Foundation. Readers with a strong stomach and time on their hands are invited to read the Project 2025 document.

What I want to offer here is a concise overview of what the Republican Party is really about—what its actual goals are—rather than over-broad declarations or a litany of all the small steps required to achieve GOP goals.

Despite all the talk of Donald Trump’s “base,” those Fox-News-Obsessed viewers who continue to enrich Trump’s coffers despite his reputed wealth and documented depravity, such people are not calling the shots for the party and are not the GOP’s most important donors. The party has long been seen as the party of business and has traditionally had many business owners and managers of small businesses as supporters. That view of the GOP is outdated and naďve.

Today, the big donors and architects of GOP strategy are corporate magnates and the super rich. In the political science sense, these folks are neither liberal nor conservative. On the whole, they are unprincipled libertarians whose primary object is to retain and increase their wealth. Their self-aggrandizing strategy is threefold:

  •  Benefit corporations and the wealthy

  •  Pander to GOP voters and potential voters

  •  Obtain and retain power

In a sense, everything could be subsumed under the third item, but the above division is helpful for exposition.

The primary goal of the GOP movers and shakers is wealth accumulation. Pandering to the masses is a way to gain support not so much for implementing the promised policies, policies not really of interest in and of themselves, but for obtaining positions facilitating the implementing their wealth-oriented policies. Obtaining and maintaining power makes all things possible.

Benefit the Wealthy

The ultimate goal of Republican Party policies is to protect wealth and to allow the wealthy to become richer still. Most of the policies designed to favor the favored are transparently useful to the wealthy class. These objectives are either not mentioned on the campaign trail or are misrepresented, disguising their real purpose. These policies include the following:

  •  Reduce taxes. Usually, middle-class tax cuts are mentioned, but the intended cuts are for corporations and the rich. Donors want to avoid higher taxes or a dreaded wealth tax.

  •  Oppose unions. Union busting makes moneymaking cheaper.

  •  Eliminate government regulations. Health and safety regulations increase corporate costs.

  •  Oppose climate change measures. These impose restrictions on industry. In an age when business’s interest seldom extends beyond the next quarter, climate change is too long-term to be of much concern.

  •  Support extractive industries at home an abroad. Extractive industries are needed for manufacturing. This includes supporting industry exploitation of public lands. Moreover, major donors are from extractive industries.

  •  Make the judiciary more libertarian. This policy has already been a great success, as the Supreme Court has been captured by anti-government, pro-business forces. Increasingly, the judiciary is the determiner of policy, not the legislative or executive branches.

  •  Reduce spending on social safety-net programs. Among other things, this reduces the needs for taxes.

  •  Reduce most foreign aid. This, too, reduces the need for taxes, though aid to countries that supply raw materials can reduce supply chain costs.

  •  Ignore human rights concerns overseas. This helps to maintain cheap labor, which keeps supply chain costs low.

  •  Impose widely applied tariffs. This reduces foreign competition on American businesses. Potential, tariff income could replace the income tax. This, of course, would favor the rich and penalize the non-rich. It likely would also destroy both the American and world economy.

  •  Minimize support for NATO and Ukraine. Support costs money.

  •  Support debt reduction. This is ironic, as Republican administrations have a habit of increasing the federal debt. But reducing the national debt necessarily drains money from less desirable federal programs.

Pander to Voter Prejudices

Electing sympathetic politicians and maintaining voter enthusiasm for them is needed to retain supporters of the radical libertarian programs. Whereas some of these policy choices advance that agenda directly, their main purpose is to attract votes, not to actually implement the promised policies, which include the following:

  •  Outlaw abortions, This has been an especially useful goal, as anti-abortion voters have tended to be both passionate and single-minded. However, having gotten a Supreme Court that overturned Roe v. Wade, the GOP becomes that dog that has finally caught the car. What happens next? The anti-abortion crowd, now wants a nationwide ban on abortion, a ban on in vitro fertilization, and even a ban on contraception. These extreme positions are widely unpopular and favor Democrats, not Republicans.

  •  Privilege “Christian” litigants. The GOP-dominated Supreme Court has increasingly expanded the notion of freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Evangelical Christians are, with GOP support, claiming religious discrimination in various contexts that earlier would have been laughed at.  These are mostly GOP voters, but mainline Christians and non-Christians tend to favor Democrats, so this strategy is risky.

  •  Oppose gun regulations of any kind. Like anti-abortion folks, Second-Amendment zealots tend to be single-minded.

  •  Oppose rights for minorities of every stripe. The GOP has largely become the party of older, straight white males. It is unsympathetic to LGBTQ+ folks and, largely, to non-whites. Emphasis here has lately focused on transgender youth and their physical and emotional needs. The country has always needed someone to hate, and transgender youth are the latest group to fulfill that role.

  •  Support publicly funded private schools. This policy has many advantages. It favors those who see public schools as too liberal and those who prefer schools that promote Christian indoctrination. It deprives public schools of funding and weakens teacher unions in public schools.

  •  Oppose teaching of balanced U.S. history. This allows Republicans to claim to be patriots and lovers of America. Those who believe that history should cover American racism, colonialism, and economic exploitation are characterized as unpatriotic America-haters.

  •  Oppose teaching children about sex. This is partly a sop to right-wing Christians who have always considered sex either sinful or nearly so. Republicans also do not what to suggest that LGBTQ+ are normal and worthy of concern. This obsession with sex also leads to book banning.

  •  Disparage colleges and universities. Institutions of higher learning  are seen as liberal bastions producing liberal voters. Not incidentally did Trump declare, “I love the “poorly educated.” Not only do Republicans hope to make academia less liberal, but they want to play into the unfortunate anti-intellectual strain that has long been present in America.

  •  Oppose immigration generally and “unlawful” immigration in particular. Although America was built by immigrants, there has always been a strain of xenophobia and a hostility to newcomers, particularly those who are not northern Europeans. For GOP funders, this position is somewhat problematic. With its aging workforce and decreasing fertility, business needs new sources of workers. This is a longer-term concern, of course, having little effect on the next quarter.

  •  Deport non-citizens. This has been especially promoted by Donald Trump, but this would be very disruptive both socially and economically. Likewise, Republicans would include Dreamers in deportations.

  •  Oppose electric vehicles. Republicans portray encouraging the purchase of electric cars and electric appliances as limiting consumer “freedom.”

  •  Support Israel unconditionally. Whereas this may seem like a fruitless attempt to garner Jewish votes, it is more likely aimed at the Evangelical Christian vote, whose adherents see Middle East conflict as potentially ushering in the end times.

On the whole, it is ironic that Republicans, who so vigorously promote “freedom,” spend so much time and energy trying to limit the freedom of their fellow Americans.

Obtain and Retain Power

Clearly, many of the policies mentioned above encourage support of GOP politicians. Additionally, Republicans have tried to foster structural arrangements that favor their party. These policies include the following:

  •  Oppose statehood for the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. These areas, despite any objective claim they might have on statehood, are viewed as having Democratic-leaning populations. Offering one or both statehood would make the Electoral College less attractive for Republicans.

  •  Make it harder for citizens to vote. Republicans fulminate about election integrity, but they are not really concerned about illegal residents voting. They are concerned about anyone who is not an old white male (and likely a Republican) voting. Their attempts to make voting more difficult are legion and do not need to be enumerated here.

  •  Oppose ranked choice voting. Such voting schemes tends to elect more moderate candidates, rather than right-wing ideologues.

  •  Use gerrymandering to increase the number of GOP legislators. Republicans have been increasingly adept at designing districts that favor their own party. It is unfortunate that when redistricting needs to be done every decade, Republicans frequently find themselves in control of state legislatures. Of course, the design of the U.S. Senate gives Republican a structural advantage. All states, regardless of population, get two Senators, but less populated states tend to be rural and Republican-leaning. Thus, the representation of Wyoming and California in the Senate is the same. Republicans will do nothing that might destroy this built-in advantage.

  •  Replace the Civil Service with an old-time spoils system. Republicans want to replace bureaucrats and subject experts in government with Republican partisans. This is part of an attempt to place the entirety of the Executive Branch of government under the direct control of a Republican president. Likewise, Republicans would have the Justice Department commanded by the president rather than being an independent administrator of justice.

  •  Favor a compliant judiciary. As mentioned earlier, the GOP has done a fine job of placing young, partisan, often poorly qualified judges into lifelong positions.

  •  Oppose campaign finance reforms. Big Republican donors want to contribute big bucks and to hide the fact from the public.

Summary

There you have a summary of what the GOP is about. Whatever the Republican Party platform says, whatever Donald Trump or JV Vance says, whatever the Project 2025 report says, what you see above is the essence of what the Republican Party in 2024 is about. It is my hope that intelligent supporters of the American Republic will oppose this agenda with all their strength and resources.

— LED, 7/27/2024

Previous Home Up Next

 
Send mail to Lionel Deimel with questions or comments about Lionel Deimel’s Farrago.
Copyright © 2000-2026 by Lionel Deimel. All rights reserved.